Tu perro es libre en tu casa: los perros agresivos en la playa atropellan el derecho de los demás
Una escena que se repite cada verano en nuestras playas: un perro enorme y sin bozal corre entre los niños mientras su dueño despacha las quejas con un «no hace nada». En la sección «Esto está mal» lo decimos con claridad: la libertad de tener un animal termina donde empiezan la seguridad y la tranquilidad de los demás, y la playa pública pertenece a todos los ciudadanos; no es el campo de entrenamiento de los perros de unos cuantos.
Anyone who has visited a public beach in summer knows the scene: a family settles near the water, children build sandcastles, and suddenly a large dog of a breed known for aggression appears — no muzzle, no leash — with its owner strolling behind, reassuring everyone with a single phrase: "Don't worry, he's friendly." But the child who burst into tears cannot tell friendly from fierce, and the mother who scooped up her toddler and ran is not interested in the dog's certificate of good conduct.
Before any talk of law, this is a moral wrong. A public beach is shared space — everyone paid for their entry or inherited it as a public right — and whoever releases a frightening animal into it is effectively declaring: my comfort, and my dog's, matter more than your children's safety. That is precisely the offence this section exists to name: the insult, the provocation, and the harm done to a citizen's peace in a place he came to for rest.
The fear here is neither a luxury nor an exaggeration. A single dog bite can mean wounds, stitches and a course of rabies shots, plus a psychological terror that may shadow a child for years — turning fear of one dog into fear of all animals and of the beach itself. And even when the dog bites no one, the mere sight of a powerful breed sprinting between beachgoers is enough to ruin the day for dozens of families.
Then there is what the eye cannot see: bathing dogs in the very seawater people swim in. A dog carries microbes and parasites on its coat and in its waste, some of them transmissible to humans, and the children swallowing seawater as they play are the most exposed. Whoever washes his dog in water where other people's children swim is treating the sea as his private bathtub. That is selfishness, plain and simple.
Let us be fair: the problem is not dog ownership, and it is not animal lovers. Caring for animals is a value we respect and encourage. The problem is the owner who refuses the most basic rules of responsibility: a leash, a muzzle for dangerous breeds, choosing appropriate places, and one simple question before approaching any family: do you mind?
Egyptian law has not left this unregulated. The Civil Code holds the keeper of an animal liable for the harm it causes, and in 2023 the legislature passed a dedicated law regulating the possession of dangerous animals and dogs — requiring licensing, setting rules for taking dogs into public spaces, and penalising violators. Whoever lets an aggressive dog loose among beachgoers is not merely committing a moral offence; he is placing himself squarely within reach of the law.
But in this section we do not bet on punishment alone, because before this is a legal problem it is a problem of public decency. Imagine each of us exporting whatever annoys our own household into the shared space: one blasts loudspeakers, another grills on the pavement, a third lets his dog loose among children. Nothing called "public space" would remain — only a jungle where the strongest and boldest claims his patch at everyone else's expense.
What is required of the dog owner is clear and needs no interpretation: do not bring a dangerous breed to a crowded public beach in the first place; if you bring a gentle dog, keep it leashed at all times and muzzled when needed; do not bathe it in water where people swim; clean up after it; and respect other people's fear even when it seems excessive to you — fear is a right that does not require your permission.
What is required of the state and local authorities is no less clear: enforce the dangerous-animals law on the beaches rather than leaving it in the Official Gazette; post explicit signs at beach entrances setting the rules for animals; and designate separate areas or hours for dog owners away from crowded family sections, so that everyone gets their due without collision.
A final message to everyone who says "I'm free and so is my dog": yes — free at home and in designated spaces. On a public beach, your freedom stops where the safety of a child begins, a child whose only strength is his scream. That's just wrong — and doing it right is simpler than you think: a leash, a muzzle, the right place, and respect for everyone else.
Noticias relacionadas

La mutilación genital femenina: un crimen que la ley castiga y la religión y la medicina rechazan... no una costumbre que merezca sobrevivir
La mutilación genital femenina se sigue practicando en silencio en nombre de la costumbre y de una falsa piedad, pese a que la ley egipcia la castiga con penas agravadas, a que Al-Azhar y Dar al-Iftaa han declarado que carece de todo fundamento religioso, y al consenso de la medicina: es puro daño, sin un solo beneficio. Este artículo no acusa a las familias, sino que las llama a proteger a sus hijas; una protección que empieza con un «no» dicho por un padre y una madre.
18 de agosto de 2026 · 7 min de lectura
«La calle es mía»: el 'sayes' matón, cuando la extorsión se convierte en servicio obligatorio
Se planta en una calle de la que no posee ni una piedra, reparte los sitios de aparcamiento como si fueran su finca y fija la tarifa según su humor; a quien proteste, un rayón de llave en la puerta del coche o una palabra hiriente delante de su familia. El 'sayes' —el aparcacoches informal— que sin licencia se impone por intimidación no es un prestador de servicios, sino un cobrador de tributos. Esto está mal: la calle es un bien público y la ley ya reguló el oficio; no hay excusa para el matonismo disfrazado con su uniforme.
18 de agosto de 2026 · 5 min de lectura
La acera es un derecho del ciudadano: los quioscos que empujan a los peatones a la muerte en el río del asfalto
Una madre empuja el carrito de su bebé entre los coches; un anciano avanza a tientas junto a los microbuses, porque la acera que se construyó para ellos se la tragaron un quiosco, unas neveras de refrescos y la mercancía en exposición. El quiosco plantado sobre la acera —aunque tenga licencia— confisca un paso construido para las personas y las empuja al río de la calzada. Esto está mal: la acera no es un inmueble que se alquila, sino una arteria de seguridad para cada ciudadano.
18 de agosto de 2026 · 5 min de lectura